Free Tool

AI Visibility Checker

Find out if ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI can actually find and recommend your website — free, instant, no signup needed.

0
AI Visibility Score

AI Crawler Access (robots.txt)

    Show raw robots.txt ▾
    Structured Data / Schema Markup 
      Show raw JSON-LD found ▾
      Entity Clarity (sameAs / identity links) 
        Content Structure (answer-ability) 
          llms.txt 
              
            THE SHIFT
            AI search is how customers find you now
            Every day, more people ask ChatGPT and Google AI for recommendations instead of searching the old way — and most local business websites are invisible to them.
            393–458
            days newer
            That’s how much fresher AI-cited content is on average than pages ranking organically in Google. (Ahrefs)
            Blocked
            = invisible
            If GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot are blocked in robots.txt, your site can never be cited — no matter how good the content is.
            #1
            on Google ≠ visible on AI
            ChatGPT and Perplexity don’t check your Google ranking. They pull from directories and review sites Google doesn’t even use.
            The Framework
            Five signals. One score.
            Every check we run rolls up into these five categories — weighted by how much they actually affect whether AI cites you.
            

            

            
Crawler Access
            Can AI bots even reach your site? If GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot are blocked, nothing else on this list matters.
            
30%
            

            

            

            
Schema Markup
            Down-weighted on purpose — AI reads the raw text inside your schema, not the formatting itself.
            
15%
            

            

            

            
Entity Clarity
            Are you clearly identified across the web — Wikipedia, Wikidata, review platforms, social profiles?
            
25%
            

            

            

            
Content Structure
            Is your content readable and citable — clear titles, FAQ-style headings, and recently updated?
            
25%
            

            

            

            
llms.txt
            Down-weighted — no confirmed evidence yet that AI platforms actually read or prioritize this file.
            
5%
            

            Proof
            We failed our own audit first
            Before we ever showed this tool to anyone else, we ran it on our own site.
            Before
            • 

						
No Organization schema connecting our brand identity
            • 

						
No FAQPage schema on our own /faq/ page
            After
            • 

						
Organization schema added, with sameAs links to our real profiles
            • 

						
FAQPage schema added
            If an agency built specifically around this problem can miss it, most local business sites don’t stand a chance without checking.
            Trust & Methodology
            No tricks. Just checks.
            No signup
            Run as many checks as you need — no account or email required.
            No AI-API cost
            Every check is deterministic logic, not a ChatGPT/Claude API call. Nothing to game.
            Read-only
            We only fetch public pages (robots.txt, homepage, FAQ/contact). Nothing on your site is touched.
            Nothing stored
            Results show in your browser and disappear when you leave. No copy kept.
            Rate-limited & safe
            Runs through a secured, rate-limited connection built to prevent abuse, not collect data.
            Sources cited by name
            Every insight links to a named source (Ahrefs, Mark Williams-Cook’s schema experiment) — not “trust us.”
            FAQ
            Common questions
            It’s a readiness score — how structurally likely your site is to be crawled, understood, and cited by AI platforms like ChatGPT and Perplexity. It’s not a live measurement of whether they’re mentioning you today; it’s what has to be true first before they can.
            No. Ranking well on Google is still the foundation — AI platforms often pull from pages that already rank organically, or from directories and review sites. This checks an additional layer: whether AI can actually access and parse what’s there.
            A published test (Mark Williams-Cook’s schema experiment) found ChatGPT and Perplexity strip schema formatting and just read the plain text inside it. Schema helps Google, but doesn’t add extra weight with AI beyond the text it contains — so we don’t over-score it.
            Start with Crawler Access — it’s weighted highest (30%) because it’s a hard gate. If GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot are blocked in robots.txt, nothing else on the list matters until that’s fixed.
            No tool can guarantee that — AI answers are non-deterministic and change between sessions. This measures the structural readiness that makes citation possible, not a guaranteed outcome.
            Most graders check Google-era signals — page speed, meta tags, backlinks. This checks the newer AI-specific layer: crawler access for AI bots, entity clarity via sameAs links, and the content freshness patterns AI platforms actually weight.
            No. Everything runs and displays in your browser. Nothing is saved on our end.
            Whenever you make a fix, or every few months — schema and content freshness both shift over time, so a score from six months ago won’t reflect what’s true now.
            Score not great? Let's fix that.
            
We build local business websites that pass this audit before they ever go live — AI crawler access, schema, entity clarity, all handled from day one. $2,000 flat, no retainer.

            



			
See the $2K Website Offer